A len? What are you saying, Brian? That there was only one element in the
lenS when you bought it? Sounds like you were fleeced well and truly. I hope
you didn't pay more than peanuts for that jamjar - although truth be told,
you certainly know how to get good results from jamjars..
Did you use bellows or 65-116 tube?
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Swale [mailto:bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 March 2012 01:30
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] (OM) A little diversioon - on topic for a change
A Zuiko len ( do I have that right, there was only one of them) fortuitously
came my way. Today the whole fam damly have taken themselves off to distant
parts, so I can do whatever I please :-)
So I chose to try it clipped onto the D-3. It's an overcast day sometimes a
little brighter, sometimes not.
http://www.brianswale.com/zuikoholics/2012/March-2012.htm
Some of the metal-work (the front ring) has seen better days, but the glass
seems very fine.
What do you think?
Brian Swale.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|