Thanks, Fernando. Nice. Don't remember seeing them before. Generally use the
Z90 & the Tamron 180 while the 135 sets on the shelf. Always thought of it as
a bellows lens, but will try it when the flowers arrive.
---- Original Message -----
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgonzalezgentile@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 00:26:11 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) A little diversioon - on topic for a change
Don,
Never for flowers?, I found it suitable even for portraits :)
Hope I didn't show this one here before, and if I did I hope you don't
remember it.
The spyderweb shines inside this flower.
Aperture was f8, bokeh is far better in the film original, I messed up
something I don't recall during postprocessing that turned a harsh the
oof background - certainly Curves.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/5749572584/in/photostream/lightbox/
I'm rather sure I didn't show this other one here before, tell me if I
did please.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/5946556365/in/photostream/lightbox/
Fernando.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Moose wrote:
>
> Well, the 135/4.5 is an excellent lens.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|