Thanks, Moose. I must confess my ignorance of OM lenses prior to the ZD
series.
That looks like a setup with a lot of flexibility.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) A little diversioon - on topic for a change
> On 3/1/2012 5:41 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Those images look very good, Brian. I see it is a 135mm. One of the
>> sharpest older lenses that I have is a Pentax Takumar 135, which works
>> fine
>> on my E-1. The only downside is that it only focuses down to around 4-5
>> feet. I note that you refer to yours as a macro, so perhaps you will not
>> encounter this problem.
>
> I believe Brian is referring to the 135/4.5 bellows lens. This is a true
> macro lens that requires either a bellows, the
> 65-116 Auto-Tube or various extension tubes to mount on the camera. It has
> only a short focusing helicoid for fine
> adjustment. <http://omesif.moosemystic.net/om-sif/lensgroup/135mmf45.htm>
>
> Macro Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|