>
> > I went and double-checked the setting, and I have it at
centre-weighted
> > averaging. I set it up this way after getting the E-500 so that it
would
> > be similar to the OM-1 metering, which I had become used to.
>
> Interesting! This brings up an oddity that I've noticed, but haven't given
> much thought to. It seems that if there is a bright spot of light in the
> scene, the averaging meter will get overly driven down. Where averaging
> normally takes into account and "averages" the entire pattern area, with
my
> E-1 and DMC-L1, the image will frequently underexpose. For example, if I
> photograph an automobile, but the sun is reflecting off of a bit of
chrome,
> the picture underexposes. In ESP mode, it does find. With the OM series,
it
> does fine.
>
<<SNIP>>
My problem has been that high-contrast situations, such as a flower that
is much brighter than the background, invariably ends up with the subject
being over-exposed. My best example of this is a series that I took of a
Stemless Evening Primrose ealier this year. That flower is a benchmark for
white. I felt that I had bracketed it well enough to compensate for the
known metering problem, but when I got home I found that I had not gone far
enough. I was not happy about that.
Earlier, the high cost of growing with the digital lenses
(teleconverters, extension tubes, etc.) led me to return to film lenses, and
I certainly cannot complain about that. Now I see that I will be returning
to using a hand-held light meter, and you won't hear me complain about that
either. The TTL metering of the E-500 is fine for just about everything
except for these high-contrast situations, and I have no issues with using a
hand-held light meter as I've done so in the past. It was a nice backup if
the OM-1 battery failed and I didn't have time to get another one before
leaving on a trip.
The Gossen Pilot 2 would be adequate, but I would like something better
than that. I was testing the General Electric PR-1 yesterday and found that
it had an interesting feature, where you have to press a button along the
side to uncage the meter and take a reading. When you release the button,
the meter needle stays put so that you can better assess the reading. So, I
can scan the subject with the meter, cage the meter at a point the I
mentally feel is an average, then set the meter down and adjust the camera
settings without losing the meter reading. Very convenient. And there's no
bloody battery.
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|