Subject: | Re: [OM] 50mm 1.8 (Re: Hoarding & Varimagni) |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:35:36 -0500 |
But, if ultimate resolution is not the requirement (it often isn't), the older lenses have their own charming characteristics. Chuck Norcutt On 1/15/2011 9:45 PM, Ken Norton wrote: >> Really? I am surprised to near this. So, which ones from my many 50mm 1.8 >> lenses should I keep? Any recommendations? > > Here are some lens tests of the 50/1.8 from various generations: > > http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=245&Itemid=97 > > and > > http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=244&Itemid=97 > > Later is definitely better. In fact, the last ones are really good! > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] More food - Donghaumen Night Market, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM Macro 50 f2 vs 50 f3.5, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50mm 1.8 (Re: Hoarding & Varimagni), Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50mm 1.8 (Re: Hoarding & Varimagni), Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |