Re: [OM] 0.95

[Chuck Norcutt]

Sorry to disappoint but there was no Canonista condescension intended. 
It was a very simple statement about the utility of high ISO shooting. 
Image stabilization is nice (and available on Canon lenses if you're 
willing to pay the freight) but image stabilization does nothing for 
subject movement.  My Canon 5D is now long-in-the-tooth for high ISO 
shooting.  I wish I had the extra 5 stops of the Nikon D3S.  I'd surely 
find a use for it with or without stabilization.

Chuck Norcutt


On 11/19/2010 7:57 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Chuck Norcutt
> <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> You likely don't shoot above 800 since the
>> E-3 probably doesn't support it very well.  If you could shoot at 1600
>> with no noise penalty why wouldn't you use that capability at least some
>> of the time?
>
> I had to chuckle at your (probable) Canonista condescension, Chuck.
> Image stabilization has something to do with it.  Probably. ;^)
>
> Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/