| Subject: | Re: [OM] 0.95 |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:17:12 -0500 |
Nikon D3S @ ISO 12,500 <http://masters.galleries.dpreview.com.s3.amazonaws.com/141849.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=14Y3MT0G2J4Y72K3ZXR2&Expires=1290047318&Signature=As8F2TtO79nNmU1mMTXv%2fPqB%2bWU%3d> Nikon D3S @ ISO 102,400 <http://masters.galleries.dpreview.com.s3.amazonaws.com/141847.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=14Y3MT0G2J4Y72K3ZXR2&Expires=1290047250&Signature=m92SvDkFYcXJ%2fLm1XHPcdRBzy%2f0%3d> Looks pretty real to me. A lot better than my 5D. :-) Chuck Norcutt On 11/17/2010 7:49 PM, AS wrote: > Is ISO 12500 just a marketing gimmick? I have yet to see an image taken that > high. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 0.95, Jeff Keller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Saving the planet or just saving money?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 0.95, Jeff Keller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 0.95, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
