Well, not exactly plenty, but it is a 25mm so it's better than something like a
Noctilux.
Now I have a question. There has been some discussion here in the past.
I'm of the understanding that a f0.95 lens is a true f0.95 regardless of sensor
size - after all, if I put a medium format f2.8 lens on a 35mm body, it's still
f2.8 AFAIK.
But there is a persistent theory that a 0.95 on an FT sensor is really
equivalent to a true f1.7 or some such. I really don't understand the thinking
behind this claim.
Anyone care to opine on this and help me make sense of it before I make some
claims in print.?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 17/11/2010, at 10:32 PM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
> Hmmm, f1.0 and still plenty of DOF.
>
> ...Wayne
>
>>
>> Voigt 25mm arrived today - and as luck would have it I had a model
>> handy.
>> Hard work to get focus right but it's rather good.
>> This image is completely unretouched (usual warnings - if nudity
>> offends, don't go there) -
>> http://www.pbase.com/image/130383184
>> The images from the 5D2 look positvely harsh in comparison.
>> I may be in love (er, with the lens).
>> Andrew Fildes
>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|