Subject: | Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al] |
---|---|
From: | John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:10:28 -0300 |
That's a strange turn of phrase ".....a ......branch of government......" Is the US Supreme Court really a branch of government ? jh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lazzari" <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "1" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 2:20 PM Subject: Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al] >> I don't believe the Constitution would have to be amended though >> to correct this; the Supreme Court would have to simply reverse the >> ruling. >> I won't hold my breath. > You are correct. However I believe it even less likely than an amendment > given the current flavor of the court. Historically the court has been > on the whole a very conservative branch of government with few > exceptions. At the time of Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific (thanks > Chuck) it was firmly in the hands of the oligarchs. It is now one member > away from being back in their hands. > > Mike > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al], JOHN DUGGAN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al], John Hudson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al], Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al], Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |