Then either don't bother or change the design. What they are saying with
what they have is, "We understand that a few of you more sophisticated
photographers want the advantages of the optical finder, but we know that
once we get you to buy the camera, most of you will just used the thing on
the back like the mindless automotons that you are and keep it, so we make
more money anyway."
From: Chris Barker [mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 5:35 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] OT: the Nykon "compact" won the competition -- a re-think
Or, perhaps, that it can't fit a device with more coverage in that space?
Chris
On 5 Nov 2010, at 22:04, Bill Pearce wrote:
> The optical finder on my G10 is absolutely useless. I saw a test where it
> was determined that it covered something like 77% of the frame. That's
> really a sign that Canon holds us in low regard.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3239 - Release Date: 11/05/10
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|