On the 5D ISO 400 is hardly distinguishable from ISO 100. ISO 800 does,
however, start to show some degradation. I guess I use ISO 100 more out
of habit than necessity although I sometimes go down to ISO 50 when
dealing with daylight fill flash.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/16/2010 4:20 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> On Oly 4/3 cameras, I can't see any difference in the images at ISO 100 and
> 200. I use 200 most of the time.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion"<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor
>
>
>> After carrying these heavy 2.8 lenses around for the past 5 years, today
>> I'd get f/4 lenses and up the ISO dial from 100 to 200. :-)
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 9/16/2010 12:35 PM, Jeff Keller wrote:
>>> Suppose you want a couple AF zooms for a brand C Zuiko body:
>>>
>>> 24-70mm f2.8 L $1,349 2.1 lbs
>>> 70-200mm f2.8L ii $2,299 3.3 lbs
>>> 5Dii $2,499 1.8 lbs
>>> Total $5,972 7.2 lbs
>>>
>>> If you are going to carry Zuikos with it, slow AF zooms may not be too
>>> appealing so yes I've shown "fast kit zooms". With this cost, weight, and
>>> size no one will think of this as an OM. Olympus shouldn't compete
>>> directly.
>>> Olympus should focus on small high quality alternatives. A really nice
>>> near
>>> pro level E410 size body, light weight (plastic) weather resistant high
>>> quality zooms, would be a nice alternative.
>>>
>>> Canon isn't sleeping in the lens area: a shift 17mm, a 100mm macro with
>>> IS
>>> intended for macro, re-tuned zooms all with nice high price tags. They
>>> are
>>> capturing attention.
>>>
>>> For me Olympus's apparent decision made at the time of the E1 that a
>>> small
>>> camera doesn't appear professional was their biggest mistake. If
>>> necessary
>>> they could have come out with a 4 lb $15,000 E-1Ds to appease those
>>> management/marketing staff needing a professional appearance while making
>>> and selling many more small digital OMs.
>>>
>>> Jeff Keller
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ken Norton [mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Subject: Re: [OM] E-5 vs GH2 sensor
>>>
>>> --snip--
>>>
>>> On a personal note, I am greatly saddened by all this. As you know,
>>> I've been a loyal Olympus "fanboy" to a fault. I have no intentions of
>>> ever giving up on the OM gear, that's for sure, but as far as anything
>>> digital? When it comes time for me to buy my next camera(s), they'll
>>> be compatible with my OM Zuikos, but the brandname won't say Olympus.
>>> I've been abandoned twice. m43? Not a chance. I won't be abandoned by
>>> this company again. Once converted to Brand-X (I think it's pretty
>>> easy to figure out which one that is going to be), there is no turning
>>> back.
>>>
>>> AG
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|