I think that the idea is that the shaking prevents a deposit remaining for
long enough to stick, as it were. I should think that it would be a waste of
time to shake a sensor that has had dust for a while.
As you suggest, Chuck, I'm no expert, but the words that you were using were
discouraging to someone like me. It's all about perceptions, isn't it?
But since you mention it, I have just submitted a photo to an image library;
before I did, I checked the file at having increased it in size by some 200%
and it seemed to be OK.
Chris
On 9 May 2010, at 21:29, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> And I seriously doubt that what is on there will be removed by
> ultrasonic shaking. Perhaps those with integrated dust removal systems
> aren't used to critically testing their sensors at very small apertures.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|