Taken in the spirit it's intended, but I was actually trying to show that
there's no particular dust problem with the 5D.
All my sensors show that much dirt in that kind of test, and virtually none
in practical use! And that particular one has had a lot of such use.
Tom
On 9 May 2010 17:54, Chris Barker wrote:
> This looks like a good way to dissuade someone from buying a camera without
> an integral sensor cleaning system ... :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On 9 May 2010, at 17:46, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> > Not too bad. I'd guess that what's visible there at f/16 would not be
> > visible at f/11. I have a great deal of difficulty getting the 5D
> > sensor squeaky clean at f/16 or higher without resorting to cleaning
> > solutions so I generally don't bother. I just use a brush. Diffraction
> > starts to intrude beyond f/11 so if it looks good at f/11 that's usually
> > good enough for me. I just avoid f/16.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|