How about posting your JPEG sizes for these tests to see if the size
differentials agree as they did before.
Chuck Norcutt
iwert bernakiewicz wrote:
> Part two of the test just finished, interior, bad mixed light, on tripod...
>
> conclusion one: the 35 shift (late, new multi coated lens) has very
> good resolution and sharpness!
>
> conclusion two: the 21mm f3.5 I have is absolutely stunning (I can't
> word it differently, I'm a zuikoholic):
> sharp in center from f3.5, sharp overall from f8 to f16, just a tiny
> bit barrel distortion.
>
> conclusion three: the 28mm f2 is not bad either, but for critical
> sharpness f5.6 and f11 are best. F2 is for available darkness.
>
> conclusion four: I sure wish that the 5D had liveview!
>
> If there is interest I can put the images up for all to see...
>
> The 21 f3.5 will come with me as well on the trip, small and shares
> it's hood with the shift :).
>
> And the sketchpad will go along as well, all in all, the developing is
> still fast at 1 hour for a complete scene and no post processing
> required :)
>
> Iwert
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|