Interesting results even though not "scientific". :-)
Chuck Norcutt
iwert bernakiewicz wrote:
> They did,
>
> 35 shift f11: 8 MB
> 35 shift f8: 7,7 MB
> 21 f8, f11, f16: 7,6 MB (but sharper than 28mm...)
> 28 f8, f11: 7,6 MB
> 28 f5.6: 7,2 MB
> 21 f5.6: 7,1 MB
> 21 f3.5: 7 MB
> 28 f4: 6,9 MB
> 28 f2: 6,8 MB
>
> Iwert
>
> (I didn't take an image @ 3200 asa to compare fil size :)
>
> 2010/3/22 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> How about posting your JPEG sizes for these tests to see if the size
>> differentials agree as they did before.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|