Of course it is, but part II of the test also showed these "results" :).
It was just coincidence when looking to the files in the folder to see
size compared to quality.
And a file with lots of noise will also be "better" :).
I do check the images by looking at them!
Iwert
2010/3/22 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I think the proof is in the results. The sensor of the 5D is
> diffraction limited at f/11 and his f/8, 11 and 16 results would seem to
> show that. The lens improves up to f/11 but diffraction starts to take
> over from there.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Jez Cunningham wrote:
>> Clever - the more detail, the less the jpeg compression can work -
>> brilliant! But is there a reference paper that 'proves' it?
>> br
>> jez
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|