I wonder if this is "horses for courses"? The f4 is a great lens, not large,
but perhaps large enough to be noticed. The f5 is just over 10cm long, which
must make it a good choice for the surreptitious. A little softness, darkness
on the screen the compromise?
Nic
On 20 Mar 2010, at 01:02, C.H.Ling wrote:
> Me too, the 200/5 is too dark to focus for me, it looks more like a F5.6
> rather than F5.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Norton"
>
>>>
>>> Hmm, maybe I should forget it.
>>>
>>
>> Personally, I think the 200/4 is a much nicer lens in every way than the
>> 200/5. But that's me.
>>
>> AG
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|