I haven't been able to make the comparison. The pics I've made with the f4 have
been stunning (in my opinion), but I've no f5 to compare against.
Nic
On 19 Mar 2010, at 17:16, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, maybe I should forget it.
>>
>
> Personally, I think the 200/4 is a much nicer lens in every way than the
> 200/5. But that's me.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|