Subject: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:02:19 +0800 |
Me too, the 200/5 is too dark to focus for me, it looks more like a F5.6 rather than F5. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Norton" > > >> Hmm, maybe I should forget it. >> > > Personally, I think the 200/4 is a much nicer lens in every way than the > 200/5. But that's me. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 Dynamic Range Test, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits, Nicolas Mitchell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits, Nicolas Mitchell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |