Hmm, maybe I should forget it.
Nic
On 19 Mar 2010, at 14:34, Nicholas Herndon wrote:
>> Hello list,
>> I am looking for an excellent condition example of the OM 200mm f5. I wonder
>> if there is anyone on the list >who has one for sale?
>> Many thanks,
>> Nic Mitchell
>
> Nic, I happened to stumble across a 200/5 for next to nothing. I had
> been looking for one for a while to complete my 49mm filter thread
> setup. I hardly used it. It was slow, soft, and really the only
> thing it had going for it was its tiny size. Maybe my copy was bad,
> but I didn't really care for it. So I sold it on the auction site.
> The 200/4 is much superior. Granted, I did no formal testing with
> charts or anything of that sort, but I did
>
>> Here again is the yearly portrait event in the HK flower show,
>> all shots with OM180/2.8 at F2.8 on a 5D II body at ISO160.
>
> CH, wonderful portraits. The 180/2.8 is such a nice lens, but it
> looks pretty big, especially compared to the 200/4. How do you feel
> it handles on an OM body, and do you prefer it on the 5DII?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|