Thanks, Andrew.
At a glance I should say that the distortion on the 20mm is similar to that on
the LX3 at 24mm (35mm equiv).
I had a look at the E-P1 in Cambridge yesterday (Cambridge is gorgeous when
there are no tourists or Christmas shoppers ;-)) and I was not impressed with
the display. The icons have a sort of shadow, presumably because of the low
resolution.
I have just bid on a GF-1 with 20mm; at least the software will remove the
distortion ... :-)
Have fun with yours.
Chris
On 6 Jan 2010, at 10:14, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/panasonic_20_1p7_o20/page3.asp
>
> And for the 17mm on PEN -
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusEP1/page22.asp
>
> Scroll to bottom in both cases for comparison graphic.
>
> Unfortunately the Pen doesn't correct the Pan but it's not extreme.
> At least I hope so 'cos I bought a 20mm from B&H and it's on its way.
> Andrew Fildes
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|