I chose the GF-1 based on some positive experiences by someone on the Leica
Users Group whose judgment I trust. According to some reviews I have read, the
E-P2 has very slow AF and difficult-to-use MF.
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> You're not helping, Ken ... :-) The E-P2 costs a fair amount in this country.
>
> Chris
>
> On 6 Jan 2010, at 16:26, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>>
>> Fortunately I'm not buying any of the above this week, but I will say that
>> the E-P1 I tried out was one of the best feeling cameras to come out in
>> years. I'd pick the E-P2 with the live-view monitor over the GF1 for two
>> primary reasons--image stabilization and better compatibility with legacy
>> 4/3 lenses.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|