But the EP-2 also has in-body IS. That means I'm waiting until at least
the EP-3. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> I chose the GF-1 based on some positive experiences by someone on the Leica
> Users Group whose judgment I trust. According to some reviews I have read,
> the E-P2 has very slow AF and difficult-to-use MF.
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> You're not helping, Ken ... :-) The E-P2 costs a fair amount in this
>> country.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 6 Jan 2010, at 16:26, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>>> Fortunately I'm not buying any of the above this week, but I will say that
>>> the E-P1 I tried out was one of the best feeling cameras to come out in
>>> years. I'd pick the E-P2 with the live-view monitor over the GF1 for two
>>> primary reasons--image stabilization and better compatibility with legacy
>>> 4/3 lenses.
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|