Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT: When is Voigtländer going to wake up? (Micro 4/3)

Subject: Re: [OM] OT: When is Voigtländer going to wake up? (Micro 4/3)
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:26:02 +1100
Sorry, my fault. Didn't realise that you were talking DOF!
It's why I just bought the 40mm Panny - to get a bit more shallow.
Of course, there's always a blur layer in PS as a last resort.  :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 07/01/2010, at 1:04 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:

> Come on, I though you guys knew me by know...
>
> Light intensity stays the same, yes, but depth of field of a 40mm f/
> 1.4 on Micro4/3 is
> the same as 80mm f/2.8 on full frame, or 150mm f/5.6 on my Mamiya, or
> 300mm f/11 on
> my Linhof.
>
> No way will an image made with a 40/1.4 on Micro4/3 look the same as
> an image made
> with an 80/1.4 on 35mm. Not only will DOF be much, much deeper, the
> 40mm lens would
> have to resolve twice as well as the 80/1.4 lens. That's not very
> likely, unless you are
> putting a Leica Summilux 35mm f/1.4 ASPH on your Micro4/3.
>
> When it comes to portrait lenses, shallow DOF is everything :-)

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz