Re: [OM] Lightroom?

[Nathan Wajsman]

I used PS since some time in the 90s and got fed up with its  
proliferation of features that might have been useful to Stalin back  
in the 1930s but which had no interest for me. Then Adobe came out  
with Lightroom and all was well.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Sue Pearce wrote:

>
> Same here--15000 files now and I would not dream of using anything
> else. I do have PS but only use it for stitching panoramas.
>
> Nathan
>
> I suspect what we have here is the contrast betweeen people that  
> used ps
> just a bit or not at all before trying lightroom, and those who have  
> a fair
> amount of time over a fair number of versions of PS.
>
> And honestly, I find the filing part incomprehensible.
>
> Bill Pearce
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/