Subject: | Re: [OM] Lightroom? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:58:35 +1100 |
The point is that if your versions of LR and PS are compatible (CS4 and LR2) then you can slip seamlessly from Lightroom into PS, do your post work and then return to LR. It's not an 'either/or' situation. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 04/11/2009, at 5:23 PM, Moose wrote: > I think preference between the interface models will largely boil down > to what sort and volume of photography one does and what sort of > editing > one wishes to do. Also to at least some extent on one's attitude > toward > post processing work. If one finds it a chore and simply wishes a > decent > job done and over with, Lightroom is likely to appeal. If one views > post > as a crucial and enjoyable part of the process of creating a completed > image, PS is more likely to satisfy. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] test from GMX, please ignore, photo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Macro OTF TTL, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Lightroom?, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Lightroom?, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |