On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I really like Camera Raw, so I'm thinking of trying Lightroom, since most of
> what I need is organizing the archive and a little editing in Camera Raw. LR
> seems to concentrate on this part of post-processing, however I know its
> real strength / target market is in batch processing - which I rarely need.
>
> I see LR 3 is available in beta, free until end-April 2010. That's a
> sensible period of time to evaluate - the usual 30-day trial is puny if you
> only get to use it once or twice a week.
>
> So is anyone else trying the beta or can offer advice on LR? (I know
> Nathan's a fan...)
When I used LR, I really liked it. If you like the result of ACR, I
think you'll be a fan.
It was hard to give up LR for something as clunky as Studio2 can be,
but I prefer the color rendered by Studio, so the rest is history.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|