Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:33:09 -0500 |
> > How is that possible? The projected geometry of a scene captured > by a quarter-area sensor on a 12mm lens (e.g. four thirds) should be > exactly the same as a 24mm on an OM? > > Perhaps you are just inclined to point your four thirds bodies up more? > Or you are using your 35mm shift lens :-) > Yes, I'm more inclined to use my OM system more. ;) I bring this up because I can't be the only one in the world who has sensed this and wondered about it. AG (tilt) Schnozz -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Ugh! Crown jewels stolen. Keep an eye out!, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Ugh! Crown jewels stolen. Keep an eye out!, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al, Dawid Loubser |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al, Dawid Loubser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |