I think I had a good copy, I felt it was an amazing lens.
Sure, the extreme corers sucked at 16mm (but why looks there, anyway?)
but otherwise, sharp sharp sharp even at f/2.8 was my copy, and by f/4
equalled or exceeded the ZD 7-14mm (except, again, in the corers of
course, where
I will never claim it to be an amazing lens).
On 17 Sep 2009, at 8:39 AM, Nathan wrote:
>
> On 17/09/2009, at 8:37, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>
>> I do sometimes miss my C*non 16-35 though :-) But I'm with Ken here -
>> 24mm rules.
>
>
> I had the 16-35mm Canon too and thought it was a dog.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|