Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al

[Chuck Norcutt]

The 16-35 Mark II is much better.  Check the Hatam tests I posted 
yesterday with respect to 18mm.

Chuck Norcutt

Nathan wrote:
> On 17/09/2009, at 8:37, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> 
>> I do sometimes miss my C*non 16-35 though :-) But I'm with Ken here -
>> 24mm rules.
> 
> 
> I had the 16-35mm Canon too and thought it was a dog.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> 
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/