Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al |
---|---|
From: | Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:04:47 +0200 |
On 17 Sep 2009, at 4:02 PM, Ken Norton wrote: > Also, on a related note--I get far more > building lean with crop sensor'd cameras than I do with 35mm. How is that possible? The projected geometry of a scene captured by a quarter-area sensor on a 12mm lens (e.g. four thirds) should be exactly the same as a 24mm on an OM? Perhaps you are just inclined to point your four thirds bodies up more? Or you are using your 35mm shift lens :-) D. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Off-topic: Spotted Technorama for a good price, Dawid Loubser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] 35mm vs. 28, 24, 21, 20mm, DrT (George Themelis) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 18 vs. Zeiss et al, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |