Thanks, Joel, for your chat about E-1 and E-3. I have the older
version of the 50-200, bought secondhand for my E-1 and it works very
well. There is some hunting when I use it for aircraft (airborne)
against a featureless sky, but otherwise it's reliable.
Have fun you (and all) at the Zuikfest ...
Chris
On 24 Aug 2009, at 22:08, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> If you get a chance to score a 50-200, old type or new, at a good
> price, go for it, but I have found that while the E-1 is very accurate
> focusing the 14-54, the 50-200 can be very poor with the E-1 and even
> with the E-330. I'm sure there's more than a bit that could be blamed
> on the photographer in my case, but I found myself using LV with the
> 50-200 on every possible occasion to get assurance about critical
> focus. (The E-3 finally brings home the bacon with the 50-200, BTW.)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|