Thanks Chris. I'm looking forward to it and just hope the glorious
weather we've been having can hold on a bit longer, although Ken and I
have had some good shooting in fog and mist. It's all good, as the
children say.
Joel W.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Chris Barker<ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks, Joel, for your chat about E-1 and E-3. I have the older
> version of the 50-200, bought secondhand for my E-1 and it works very
> well. There is some hunting when I use it for aircraft (airborne)
> against a featureless sky, but otherwise it's reliable.
>
> Have fun you (and all) at the Zuikfest ...
>
> Chris
>
> On 24 Aug 2009, at 22:08, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
>> If you get a chance to score a 50-200, old type or new, at a good
>> price, go for it, but I have found that while the E-1 is very accurate
>> focusing the 14-54, the 50-200 can be very poor with the E-1 and even
>> with the E-330. I'm sure there's more than a bit that could be blamed
>> on the photographer in my case, but I found myself using LV with the
>> 50-200 on every possible occasion to get assurance about critical
>> focus. (The E-3 finally brings home the bacon with the 50-200, BTW.)
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|