I was only surprised that Olympus would sell a camera without TTL flash.
Dr. Flash
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> Which makes it a perfect camera for Dr. Flash!
>
> I am surprised that you're surprised. TTL would have added a lot of
> propriety circuitry to a manual camera that sold for $160 and which,
> as Dr. Flash would say, doesn't work much better than flash-auto
> anyway.
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Chuck
> Norcutt<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This was a shock. I've never seen an OM-2000 and had no idea the
>> OM-2000 doesn't have TTL flash control. I had to go double check with
>> the eSIF and the user's manual before I'd believe it.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Ian Manners wrote:
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>
>>>> Two reasons alone to have one is the higher flash sync-speed and the
>>>> double-exposure mode. The fact it also has a spot-meter ain't half bad
>>>> either. Oh, did I mention it's substantially lighter than a single-digit OM
>>>> body?
>>> Shame it's only a standard flash shoe, be really nice if it had TTL !
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Ian Manners
>>> Every difficulty slurred over will be a ghost to disturb your repose later
>>> on.
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|