Subject: | Re: [OM] To OM2000 or not to OM2000 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:40:50 -0400 |
That's easy. The OM-2 is not one of the *non-TTL* cameras listed and therefore not the subject of my comment. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: >> I understand that full well. But the the non-TTL flash cameras here are >> early production. The OM2000 was end of the line. >> > > > I don't understand that statement. TTL with the OM line began with the > OM-2, which predated all of the non-single-digit OM bodies. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] You know you are in Iowa..., Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Olympus Power Bounce Grip 2, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] To OM2000 or not to OM2000, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Time to ask this question - batteries for OM-1?, usher99 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |