Which makes it a perfect camera for Dr. Flash!
I am surprised that you're surprised. TTL would have added a lot of
propriety circuitry to a manual camera that sold for $160 and which,
as Dr. Flash would say, doesn't work much better than flash-auto
anyway.
Joel W.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Chuck
Norcutt<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This was a shock. I've never seen an OM-2000 and had no idea the
> OM-2000 doesn't have TTL flash control. I had to go double check with
> the eSIF and the user's manual before I'd believe it.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Ian Manners wrote:
>> Hi Ken,
>>
>>> Two reasons alone to have one is the higher flash sync-speed and the
>>> double-exposure mode. The fact it also has a spot-meter ain't half bad
>>> either. Oh, did I mention it's substantially lighter than a single-digit OM
>>> body?
>>
>> Shame it's only a standard flash shoe, be really nice if it had TTL !
>>
>> Cheers
>> Ian Manners
>> Every difficulty slurred over will be a ghost to disturb your repose later
>> on.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|