Thanks. I do like your second attempt on the tire. But if you knew my
granddaughter you'd know you've given her jaundice in the first image.
:-) But somewhere in between mine and yours might lie the truth.
So, what did you do?
Dr. No Flash
Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Maybe we don' need no steenkin' flashes. .... As I mentioned not long ago,
>> this year I decided to try
>> without fill flash and make up the difference in PhotoShop. Here's what
>> I've got so far.
>> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Alex%20&%20Caitlin%20-%20August%202009/>
>>
>
> I think more realistic results are possible.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/img_2646.htm>
>
>
>> ... What's missing for sure is the flash catch lights.
>
> To me, losing catch lights is a plus, as it looks more natural.
>
>> I'm not sure what if anything I'll do from here but it's certainly possible
>> I think to do without the flash and make do with post-processing. Even the
>> shot on the tire in full sun doesn't look too bad.
>>
>
> Again, I think a more natural result is possible.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/img_2609.htm>
>
> Dr. No Flash d'Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|