Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Maybe we don' need no steenkin' flashes. .... As I mentioned not long ago,
> this year I decided to try
> without fill flash and make up the difference in PhotoShop. Here's what I've
> got so far.
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Alex%20&%20Caitlin%20-%20August%202009/>
>
I think more realistic results are possible.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/img_2646.htm>
> ... What's missing for sure is the flash catch lights.
To me, losing catch lights is a plus, as it looks more natural.
> I'm not sure what if anything I'll do from here but it's certainly possible I
> think to do without the flash and make do with post-processing. Even the
> shot on the tire in full sun doesn't look too bad.
>
Again, I think a more natural result is possible.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/CNorcutt/img_2609.htm>
Dr. No Flash d'Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|