I have a small stock of Kodak and Fuji portrait films but it has been
relegated to the freezer for the past 3 years and I've used very little
of it. Has its composition been changed to improve scanning during that
time or has it always been so? In other words, will I do well to
replace it?
Chuck Norcutt
Ken Norton wrote:
>> This raises the question of which 100 and 400 films today are the best
>> for scanning.
>>
>
> The Kodak Portra films scan about the best of anything out there, but Fuji
> 160S has nicer color (in my opinion). You can't go wrong with the Portra
> films or the Fuji pro 160 and 400 films.
>
> On a side note, I actually find Fuji Superia 400 to scan exceptionally well.
> It is grainy, but the color and saturation holds very well. The Kodak Gold
> films are slightly less grainy during scanning, but to give them the same
> color/saturation as the Fuji film, the grain is right back up there in your
> face.
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|