Subject: | Re: [OM] Hi Res film scans on a CD |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:25:39 -0400 |
This raises the question of which 100 and 400 films today are the best for scanning. Chuck Noructt Chuck Norcutt wrote: > Thanks. > > Chuck Norcutt > > usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: >> A few reports on the list that the Costco scans aren't bad--at least on >> the same continent. More often than not I get mine scanned on the >> Fuji Frontier at 6X9 at 300dpi---that is not their usual scan but they >> through it in for me. (about 9 bucks per 36 roll for everything and >> index print for the 4X6's and CD. >> The medium sized prints can be very nice from the Frontier but the >> scans are so-so. The ektar 100 scans well enough so that it is fine >> for most purposes for me till I have time to do something about it. >> >> Mike >> >> http://lists.tako.de/Olympus-OM/2007-08/msg01005.html >> >> >> >> I relied solely on costco scans for a few years but then got an epson >> V700. Now I generally prefer my own scans, but I still get costco scans >> as they are handy for screening and sometimes they still win out. >> >> >> -- >> Russ Butler (NJ USA) >> -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 27: just home and back to Warsaw, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Pikes Peak Hillclimb, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hi Res film scans on a CD, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hi Res film scans on a CD, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |