ML Archiv: Re: [OM] bokeh

Subject:	Re: [OM] bokeh
From:	"Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:54:33 +1100

> 
> This one has that soft, smooth? look despite the spikey 
> subject: http://phogra.com/g/v/Jan2009/PutneyPark/spikygrass.jpg.html
>

That is unusual, looks almost like a double exposure.

...Wayne


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, (continued) Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, WayneS Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, WayneS [OM] bokeh, Brent Re: [OM] bokeh, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] bokeh, Brent Re: [OM] bokeh, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] bokeh, Wayne Harridge <= Re: [OM] bokeh, WayneS Re: [OM] bokeh, Ken Norton Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Jan Steinman

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] bokeh, Chris Crawford
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Joel Wilcox
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] bokeh, Chris Crawford
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] bokeh, WayneS
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]