Thanks for the praise, it just happen that most of the shots has to be done
at the very long end of the 50-200 and close to the object in order to get
enough magnification, all these combinations made the OOF background softer.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
> Arrrgh! Where were you at the beginning of this thread? Those are a
> lot better examples of the bokeh of the 50-200 than anything I posted!
> Brilliant job, C.H.
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:04 AM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If you are looking for a long lens that is good up to 1:4 (1:2 in FF
>> system), the DZ50-200 is not too bad. It is ok for butterfly but don't
>> expect to shoot bee with it.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/E-1_1/butterfly.htm
>>
>> For the 135/4.5, it is good for still objects:
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/40D02.htm
>>
>> I believe the new DZ100mm macro is an excellent lens but the price could
>> be
>> very high and don't know if the AF issue can be solved with the E-30.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|