Subject: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh |
---|---|
From: | Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:15:05 -0800 |
> From: WayneS <om3ti@xxxxxxxx> > > One thing I have noticed in the photos posted, mine and others, > is that foreground OOF elements are often a distraction, in even > the best of shots. I have few of my shots where I find it OK. > I'm curious what others think? One of the first things I teach in class is that the quality of the foreground highlights determines the *perception* of the overall quality. No matter how good the rest of the image is, a bright fuzzy thing in front will cause others to perceive that the entire image is fuzzy. :::: A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -- Edward Abbey :::: :::: Jan Steinman http://www.VeggieVanGogh.com :::: -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Going home, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] New SD Memory card spec 2Tb, Larry G. Griffin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |