Subject: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:16:58 +1100 |
> usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: > > I should more precisely have stated directly 1:1. The VF remains quite > bright with CV 125 due to the aperture. It doesn't solely use extension > to get to 1:1. Can't say I've ever seen any images with the 135 at > higher mags---I usually put the 80 f4 on the autotube to get that---it > is quite nice. With many more mm ext seems like the 135 would get to be > a handful and difficult to keep stable in the field. The 80/4 probably performs better at 1:1 than the 135/4.5 (though I haven't done any comparitive tests), the thing I like about the 135/4.5 is that it will focus to infinity on the bellows. ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] My OM Zuiko Rebirth, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] My OM Zuiko Rebirth, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] More managed bokeh, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |