Subject: | [OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit? |
---|---|
From: | "Ian Nichols" <ian.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:13:19 +0000 |
On 21/02/2008, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > b) that he > should have rejected the goods within a much shorter time, perhaps a > week or so. Since the computer was posted on 13 November last year, 3 > months is too long to exercise a claim. Ah, sorry, missed that bit the first time - yes, I'd say 3 months is rather too long to wait before claiming transit damage. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit?, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit?, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit?, Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: OT: in the UK, who is responsible for goods damaged in transit?, John Hermanson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |