Subject: | [OM] Re: The one dollar digital camera |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:48:36 -0400 |
Based on a 400x400 pixel image? Surely you jest. Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > > The point of my comparision is a little backwards, maybe. The common > argument we've been hearing for the past five years is "Digital is as > good as Film". Well, I reversed this. My comparision is that "Film > is as good as Digital". > > I'm waiting for somebody to tell me which is which, BTW. > > AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: The one dollar digital camera, AG Schnozz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: The one dollar digital camera, Rob Harrison |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: The one dollar digital camera, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: The one dollar digital camera, Rob Harrison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |