I'll take the bait.
Top one Digital.
Bottom one Film.
That's my guess :)
Dan S.
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of AG Schnozz
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:03 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: The one dollar digital camera
iwert wrote:
> Interesting indeed... here the film costs are as follows: about 3 euro
> for the cheapest option in non off-brand film, and then a whopping 10
> euro for processing only. (and one hour is not an option here anymore,
> simply disappeared, except for "big towns".)
I have found similar price descrepencies in the smaller non-WalMart towns
here. With WalMart listing 4-roll packs of Fujicolor-100 for $2.50 each (24
exp rolls) and $1.76 processing (no prints), shooting film has never been
cheeper for me.
The point of my comparision is a little backwards, maybe. The common
argument we've been hearing for the past five years is "Digital is as good
as Film". Well, I reversed this. My comparision is that "Film is as good
as Digital".
I'm waiting for somebody to tell me which is which, BTW.
AG
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|