Dr Flash wrote:
> Based on a 400x400 pixel image? Surely you jest.
Nope, I'm serious. I "normalized" the images as much as possible to
mimick the end result of a normal print or screen display. Some would
say "dumbed down" and that isn't too far out.
If you want to "pixel-peep", that's your business. But this
comparison was the opposite of "pixel-peeping", but more in line with
the typical output.
I will probably put together a pixel-peeper comparison, but to what
end? Unless the end result is a print at maximum possible size, it
really doesn't matter. For anything 11x14 and smaller, I can get the
output of film and the E-1 to be virtually indestinguishable.
ken
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the
tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|