Tom Fenwick wrote:
> I think there are two things going on - the noise reduction function
> is set on but probably not doing anything, and there is some noise
> reduction smoothing going on in the image processing; it's not obvious
> unless you can look at the files side by side (or unless Moose makes a
> rollover demonstration...), but the raw file is way sharper and a bit
> grittier.
>
Tom, I started to do that yesterday, overlaid and aligned the images.
But whether something else in going on or you have the labels reversed
on your web page, in each case, the image labeled RAW is softer, with
both less defined noise and less image detail than the one labeled JPG.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|