I guess it's a shame they weren't SHQ jpegs as well; I'll try to find
a good test subject again today...
Tom
On 19/05/07, Tom Fenwick <super.wide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think there are two things going on - the noise reduction function
> is set on but probably not doing anything, and there is some noise
> reduction smoothing going on in the image processing; it's not obvious
> unless you can look at the files side by side (or unless Moose makes a
> rollover demonstration...), but the raw file is way sharper and a bit
> grittier.
>
> Tom
>
> On 19/05/07, Richard Ociepka <ociepka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Tom Fenwick wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Say no more:
> > > www.pbase.com/tom_77/gasworks
> > >
> > > Two examples of an HQ jpeg with n.r. on
> >
> > Does the noise reduction in the 410 work at 1/60th sec. shutter speed?
> >
> > Dick
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|